Life in the Blogosphere: Comment Moderation or Censorship?

Monday, October 22, 2007

There’s an ongo­ing dis­cus­sion among blog­gers con­cern­ing com­ments. Every so often, the dia­logue inten­si­fies before going to the back burner again, only to be revived peri­od­i­cally. In the process, vol­umes have been writ­ten about why the vast major­ity of read­ers do not leave com­ments on blogs and how to encour­age them to do so. Many blog­gers have spon­sored con­tests in pur­suit of com­ments. On the flip side, a fair num­ber have dis­abled the com­ment func­tion alto­gether, pre­fer­ring to sim­ply let their writ­ing speak for itself and fore­go­ing inter­ac­tion with their readers.

Much of the debate has focused on the ques­tion of whether or not com­ments should be mod­er­ated, i.e., require the blog owner’s approval before appear­ing on the site. I have never mod­er­ated com­ments on my own blog, largely because I encour­age my read­ers to be hon­est and forth­right in a respect­ful fash­ion. If a reader dis­agrees with my view­point, I want them to express their opin­ion. I guess that I have been lucky so far — no reader has ever abused my open approach by leav­ing inap­pro­pri­ate com­ments on my site.

So I really never gave the topic a lot of thought. Until this past week, that is.

Twice in the past week, I have had the expe­ri­ence of being cen­sored by blog­gers who opt to “mod­er­ate” com­ments on their blogs.

I wish I could tell you that I said some­thing out­ra­geous, out­landish or even slightly con­tro­ver­sial. I did not even attempt to pro­voke the blog owner into vig­or­ous debate.

In both instances, my remark was extremely benign: On one site, I merely stated that I dis­agreed with the author’s state­ments, but did not elab­o­rate. On the other blog, I respect­fully sug­gested that the author’s con­clu­sions about cause and effect in a par­tic­u­lar sit­u­a­tion might be reeval­u­ated in light of one fac­tor he failed to take into con­sid­er­a­tion. In nei­ther instance did I insult, belit­tle or attack the author. But the result was the same: My com­ments never showed up on their sites. They appar­ently chose to elim­i­nate my con­tri­bu­tion to the dis­cus­sions. Check­ing back sev­eral times over the course of sev­eral days, I noted that com­ments on both sites are exclu­sively com­pro­mised of endorse­ments of the author’s ideas and conclusions.

This expe­ri­ence has caused me to recon­sider the issue, begin­ning with the pur­pose of com­ments. Obvi­ously, the goal is inter­ac­tiv­ity. If an author is not inter­ested in get­ting feed­back from his/her read­ers, a sta­tic site is a per­fectly accept­able solution.

But once an author deter­mines that he/she wants to “open the floor,” so to speak, is there an implied oblig­a­tion to mon­i­tor one’s site in a fair, bal­anced and egal­i­tar­ian fash­ion? Is there an oblig­a­tion to allow rea­soned and civil dis­course that includes the asser­tion of a view­point at odds with the site author’s?

Or is it the province of the site owner to mod­er­ate com­ments in any man­ner he/she deems appro­pri­ate, even to the point of ban­ning any com­ment from a reader who espouses a view­point that dif­fers from his/her own?

It seems to me that it is incum­bent upon blog­gers who desire to be per­ceived as respon­si­ble and fair to post a com­ment pol­icy in the event that he/she elects to mod­er­ate com­ments, set­ting forth the pre­cise stan­dards by which com­ments will be assessed. Even that is not a fool-proof sys­tem, how­ever. In the lat­ter instance I have cited here, the author devotes a whole page to an expla­na­tion of the “com­ment pol­icy,” even pro­claim­ing that “dis­agree­ing with me is pos­i­tively encour­aged.” Obvi­ously, the sec­ond part of the equa­tion is sim­ple but elu­sive for some: If you estab­lish a pol­icy, live up to it in order to assure that, as a blog­ger, you estab­lish and main­tain credibility.

To those of you who main­tain blogs, I pose this ques­tion: Do you have a com­ment pol­icy? Is it dis­played on your site? Do you mod­er­ate com­ments? If so, why? If not, why not?


Tech­no­rati Tags:

On the Same Topic:

{ 1 trackback }

Hotabb.Com » Life in the Blogosphere: Comment Moderation or Censorship?
Sunday, October 28, 2007 at 12:28 pm

{ 19 comments }

1 MyStarbucks Monday, October 22, 2007 at 5:20 pm

I do not mod­er­ate my com­ments. I used too but I thought maybe it kept peo­ple from mak­ing com­ments because their com­ments would not appear right away. I read them all and if some­thing is totally inap­pro­pri­ate then I delete it but that is really more for swear­ing and spam. I think folks should wel­come com­ments even if it dis­agrees with the authors view. That’s what stirs up the con­ver­sa­tion and makes a blog fun.

2 Loz Monday, October 22, 2007 at 8:40 pm

I started off with unmod­er­ated com­ments but had to change that when I was flamed. I have now switched it off again and I am hold­ing my breath wait­ing for bad things to hap­pen again. I am cer­tainly not afraid of peo­ple express­ing an opin­ion but will draw the line at abuse.

Loz’s last blog post..Fick­le­ness

3 Hair Loss Solution Monday, October 22, 2007 at 9:18 pm

I like this blog because it gives you the free­dom of speech. I am happy that you allow your read­ers to give you a feed back and also lis­ten to their sug­ges­tion for changes required if any.
I totally believe that if a reader has spent time read­ing your post and thinks some­thing about what he has read and wants to share his thoughts then he should be given an oppor­tu­nity to express his thoughts by way of com­ments.
If you close your doors for advice to make you and your blog bet­ter then I guess you can­not sur­vive in the mar­ket for long.
Pos­i­tive feed back makes you under­stand that you are going in the right direc­tion. And
Neg­a­tive crit­i­cism helps you make the improve­ments to go in the right direction.

4 bosley Tuesday, October 23, 2007 at 7:16 am

It’s always great to get com­ments from your blog read­ers. Appar­ently because you real­ize that some peo­ple actu­ally read through them.

5 Ms Catcalls Tuesday, October 23, 2007 at 11:48 am

I dont have a pol­icy . I wouldnt have thought of it ! I didnt mod­er­ate my com­ments in the past then my daugh­ter , who is only thir­teen left an amus­ing com­ment but it was writ­ten as she speaks with her pals ( she’s 13) full of swear­words and pro­fan­i­ties ( mis­spelt too !! ) . I dis­cussed with her and she agreed it was bet­ter that they came off .. she had not really thought they would be seen by the world . After that I started mod­er­at­ing but you have made me think . Ive always pub­lished all com­ments anyway .

6 kailani Tuesday, October 23, 2007 at 1:09 pm

I don’t mod­er­ate my com­ments but I used to because of the tremen­dous amount of spam com­ments I was get­ting. Even with Akismet, there are some that still get through. Recently, there was a super long one that was filled with vul­gar lan­guage. I didn’t even know it was there until some­one pointed it out for me.

kailani’s last blog post..To See Or Not To See

7 Rock Wednesday, October 24, 2007 at 12:21 am

You high­lighted a nice point. It’s sad that peo­ple hardly get com­ments. It’s been 5 blogs since I last received a com­ment, lol. If some­one is wait­ing for a com­ment on his blog, that means he is expect­ing his read­ers, more often than not, to praise. But it stirs up a healthy dis­cus­sion for cou­ple of days. Mod­er­at­ing com­ments will only make mat­ters worse. First ques­tion, that a com­menter would think is, why should I put my e-mail, pass­word, unless and until the blog is not impres­sive ? Hav­ing an anony­mous option in com­ments is always good, yes spam­mers do strike. Unless they haven’t struck you, you can leave them unmoderated.If some­one is post­ing a com­ment, he/ she would quickly refresh the page to see if his com­ment appeared or not, as in they made a point and it is vis­i­ble to every­one. If it doesn’t once, he would think twice of post­ing a com­ment on any blog or web­site. I got an error as I did not enter my e-mail id while I was post­ing this. Being a blog­ger, I myself don’t like fill­ing all my details includ­ing my birth­day and blood group in the com­ments section.

Rock’s last blog post..Force India, eh..

8 Anali Wednesday, October 24, 2007 at 6:53 am

I don’t mod­er­ate my com­ments, but I do state in my dis­claimer that I may delete com­ments. Now that I think about it, I may clar­ify my pol­icy even further.

I get a fair num­ber of com­ments and there is often some lively dis­cus­sion. Very rarely do I delete com­ments, but I have received some com­ment spam and strange bab­bling hate speech, which I deleted. Other than that, it’s pretty much fair game.

I think it’s really up to the blog owner what they want to do. If I see that my com­ments aren’t put up or that the blog host only answers cer­tain com­menters, I just don’t go back and assume I’m not welcome.

Anali’s last blog post..Big Bad Bread — The Roundup

9 BetteJo Wednesday, October 24, 2007 at 10:05 am

I don’t mod­er­ate my com­ments, but I did delete one that was obvi­ous spam and encour­aged other com­men­tors to click on a link. How­ever, there is a blog I read that some­one has left unnec­es­sar­ily rude com­ments on the last 2 times she has posted. Com­ments that were more mean spir­ited than actu­ally address­ing what the post was about in a gen­uine way. If that started hap­pen­ing to me — I might start mod­er­at­ing.
As far as blog­gers hav­ing any kind of oblig­a­tion once they open up their blogs for com­ments — to share all com­ments good or bad — well I guess I feel like peo­ple should be able to do with their blog what they want to do. If they want to cut out the com­ments they don’t like — well — so be it. Their read­er­ship will suf­fer for it when peo­ple start to real­ize they are being shut out at the author’s whim.
I like the give and take, but I am gen­er­ally not con­tro­ver­sial at all either.
Inter­est­ing sub­ject. I have writ­ten a post or 2 (still sit­ting in draft) about why I com­ment some­times and why I don’t, but never from the stand­point of what I will allow oth­ers to do on my blog. Hmmm.
Lotta things mak­ing me go hmmmm lately. :smile:

BetteJo’s last blog post..Finally

10 Amber Wednesday, October 24, 2007 at 12:37 pm

I don’t have a writ­ten com­ment pol­icy, but I do delete com­ments which are abu­sive or oth­er­wise innapro­pri­ate — because I have a cou­ple of com­mer­i­cal blogs cov­er­ing celebri­ties, amongst other things, I get a fair amount of those, unfor­tu­nately. I also delete spam com­ments, and com­plain to the site owner if I can find con­tact infor­ma­tion for them.

I’ve some­times con­sid­ered hav­ing a writ­ten com­ment pol­icy on my sites, but I don’t really think it would be par­tic­u­larly effec­tive: spam­mers don’t bother to read com­ment poli­cies (or any of the site, really), and trolls/abusive com­men­tors don’t care about them.

11 supertiff Wednesday, October 24, 2007 at 2:07 pm

my site auto­mat­i­cally mod­er­ates my com­ments even though i don’t want it to. i tried to turn it off, but the clos­est i could get was that com­ments will show up imme­di­ately if they come from a per­son who has com­mented at least 2x before…so, first time com­menters are mod­er­ated. this really both­ers me, because i think it’s a big step for read­ers to make that first com­ment, and i want it to be a positve expe­ri­ence, you know? i don’t want them to feel judged.

i have peo­ple dis­agree with me occas­sion­ally, but so far every­one has done so in an accept­able fash­ion. i think my read­ers know that i’m really sen­si­tive, and they try to take that into con­sid­er­a­tion when they dis­agree with me. and i love them for it!
i love them even more for disagreeing…i would hate to use my blog as a sim­ple tool for get­ting myself con­sis­tently pat­ted on the back or whatever.

once, two years ago, an ‘anony­mous’ per­son left a really mean and ranty com­ment that was overly hate­ful: in it, my mother and myself we called some really hate­ful and inap­pro­pri­ate names.

i deleted it, and then i felt bad, even though the com­ment was dis­gust­ing and offered only hate with no rel­e­vance to any­thing dis­cussed in the post.

so, i guess that’s my answer. down with mod­er­a­tion! of course, we can’t make every­one agree: some peo­ple just want to feel val­i­dated all the time. but, i have to admit, when i come across blogs like that, i really won­der about the integrity of what i’m reading.

thanks for bring­ing this up (again). i think i’m actu­ally going to put a com­ment ‘pol­icy’ on my site, so that peo­ple will know that they are encour­aged to say what­ever they want.

supertiff’s last blog post..octo­ber 23, again.

12 Nicholas Wednesday, October 24, 2007 at 5:38 pm

I don’t mod­er­ate com­ments, though I have deleted two: one was spam and the other was from some­one I know in real life who revealed per­sonal details about where I live.

I find it annoy­ing when I write a com­ment and then see that it has to await the blog owner’s approval. I very sel­dom go back to check, so I don’t know how many, if any, of my com­ments have been disallowed.

13 Hair Loss Solution Friday, October 26, 2007 at 1:06 am

Same here, even I hate to go back and check whether the com­ment has got approved or not. I hate blogs where they take ages to approve 1 com­ment. I mean who has the time to wait.…..

14 Frank C Monday, November 12, 2007 at 10:37 pm

I mod­er­ate posts that con­tain links in order to pre­vent com­ment spam. I also have a few words that can cause a post to end up in the mod­er­ate queue. But, as long as it isn’t spam I’ll post it.

I did have some­one cen­sor a com­ment when I dis­agreed with them. In response, I expanded my com­ment into a blog post that ended up get­ting a lot of traf­fic. :twisted:

Frank C’s last blog post..5 Ques­tions Dou­ble Whammy Meme Tag

15 Saedel Monday, November 12, 2007 at 10:49 pm

Got this site from Blog­ging­Zoom… the topic is inter­est­ing so I decided to comment.

In my site, the com­ment will auto­mat­i­cally appear if the reader has a pre­vi­ously approved com­ment. I have few loyal read­ers and they enjoy the lux­ury of com­ment­ing with­out the cen­sor­ship, since I already know that they wouldn’t post any mean remarks about me or the site itself.

Regard­ing spam, Akismet does a pretty good job fil­ter­ing them.

Saedel’s last blog post..Dear Blo­gRush, Have You For­saken Me?

16 lissie Tuesday, November 13, 2007 at 1:27 am

I would love to have unmod­er­ated com­ments– but I get more spam than any­thing else some of which is obscene –and I dont want to be banned from Adsense! Every­thing that is not spam I allow though

lissie’s last blog post..A new type of Social Net­work­ing — Blog­ging Zoom

17 A Blog about Nothing Tuesday, November 13, 2007 at 5:25 am

I have nei­ther the time nor the desire to mod­er­ate com­ments. If the com­ment is so awful that I feel a need to mod­er­ate it (per­sonal attacks, and things along those lines) I’ll prob­a­bly just delete it and ban the offend­ing party, but beyond that I’m not going to shove my words down peo­ples throats.

A Blog about Nothing’s last blog post..A penny saved

18 Rod Tuesday, November 13, 2007 at 9:07 am

I do mod­er­ate my com­ments, sim­ply to stop the spam that doesn’t get caught by Akismet. If some­one dis­agrees with any­thing I post, that’s fine. Com­ments like that will get approved.

I draw the line at abu­sive posts, and I’ll aster­isk out exple­tives if I come across them, but that’s about it.

I don’t have a writ­ten com­ment pol­icy, though, I may do one up in the future.

Rod’s last blog post..Would you blog dif­fer­ently if you had a Mil­lion Dollars?

19 Nona Monday, March 24, 2008 at 2:08 pm

I’ve never mod­er­ated my com­ments, though some do get lost into my spam filters.

Nona’s last blog post..Exhausted to the point of zombification

Sorry, but comments are no longer being accepted.

Previous post:

Next post:



Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.